Veteran MD Drops Bombshell At 5G Hearing

Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an internal medicine physician & professor gives her testimony regarding the dangers of electromagnetic radiation. She says: “Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period.”
Read more about it here: https://www.collective-evolution.com/2018/10/26/veteran-md-drops-bombshell-at-michigans-5g-small-cell-tower-legislation-hearing/

(757)

About The Author
-

19 Comments

  • Scott Sanders
    Reply

    The bastards in Congress don’t want to hear about it obviously with only 5 minutes allowed for her to make her case. They are on the take from lobbyists from the wireless industry!

  • David Hidalgo
    Reply

    This is way beyond out of control. A very large percentage, if not all of the “officials” in positions of power in the federal gov’t come directly from industry as either executives or lobbyist backgrounds. They represent to companies that stand to make the most from all of this. It’s insane and they care not the damage it is doing to our world. This leaves one feeling like giving up all together

  • Tonio Gant
    Reply

    Case 1:18-cv-02030 Document 1 Filed 08/29/18

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    FREEDOM WATCH, INC., individually and on behalf of
    those similarly situated
    2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW #345
    Washington, DC, 20006

    Plaintiffs,
    v.
    CLASS ACTION
    GOOGLE, INC. COMPLAINT
    160 Amiptheatre Parkway
    Mountain View, CA, 94043
    And
    FACEBOOK, INC.,
    1 Hacker Way
    Menlo Park, CA, 94025
    And
    TWITTER, INC.,
    1355 Market Street #900
    San Francisco, CA, 94103
    And
    APPLE, INC.
    1 Infinite Loop
    Cupertino, CA, 95014

    Defendants.

    I.   INTRODUCTION AND CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS

    Plaintiff Freedom Watch, Inc. (“Freedom Watch”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, bring this suit as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The class is defined as all politically conservative organizations, entities
    IV.   STANDING
    10.   Freedom Watch, individually and those similarly situated, have standing to bring this action because they have been directly affected and victimized by the unlawful conduct complained herein. Their injuries are proximately related to the conduct of Defendants, acting in concert in restraint of trade and other unlawful acts, each and every one of them.
    V.   FACTS
    Defendants’ Suppression and Censorship of Conservative Content
    11.   It has been revealed that Defendants, each and every one them, have engaged in a conspiracy to intentionally and willfully suppress politically conservative content.
    12.   This conspiracy has resulted in severe financial loss, as well as unconstitutional suppression of speech and other content, for Freedom Watch and those similarly situated.
    13.   Acting in concert with traditional media outlets, including but not limited to Cable News Network (“CNN”), MSNBC, the New York Times and the Washington Post – all of whom are owned and/or managed by persons with a leftist political ideology, Defendants have intentionally and willfully suppressed politically conservative content in order to take down President Donald Trump and his administration with the intent and purpose to have installed leftist government in the nation’s capital and the 50 states.
    14.   Defendants’ goal is to use their position of influence and great market power – as
    set forth below – to re-craft the nation into their leftist design.
    15.   Indeed, many executives of Defendants and at CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times and the Washington Post, which outlets are not being suppressed, are intricately connected with former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State and presidential Case..
    .. candidate Hillary Clinton, and former President Bill Clinton and still serve their interests, as well as those of other leftist politicians, through the media.
    16.   It has been widely reported and documented that Defendants have each, as part of the conspiracy described herein, actively, willfully, and intentionally and/or or through parallel concerted violative conduct suppressed conservative content in furtherance of their political agendas and those of their co-conspirators.
    17.   According to Senator Ted Cruz, as reported in the New York Times, “if internet companies are not a ‘neutral platform,’ they should not be protected by a law known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which (some claim) gives companies broad legal immunity for what people put on their services.”1
    18.   In the same article, Rep. Kevin McCarthy stated, “Social media platforms are increasingly serving as today’s town squares….But sadly, conservatives are too often finding their voices silenced.”2
    19.   In an article from the National Review, it was revealed that each and every one of the Defendants have actively suppressed conservative content.3 (the “National Review Article”). 20.   YouTube is one of the top three most visited websites globally (along with coDefendant Facebook and its parent company, Google) and, as of 2017, it was used by over one billion users each month—almost one out of every two people on the Internet.

    1 Adam Santariano, Trump Accuses Google of Burying Conservative News in Search Results, N.Y. Times, Aug. 28, 2018, available at:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/28/business/media/google-trump-news-results.html
    2 Id.
    3 Ben Shapiro, Viewpoint Discrimination with Algorithms, National Review, Mar. 7, 2018, available at: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/social-media-companies-discriminateagainst-conservatives/

    Case 1:18-cv-02030 Document 1 Filed 08/29/18 Page 20 of 21

    99.   Defendants act as quasi-state actors because they regulate their public platforms, thereby regulating free speech within their public forums, Google/YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, Apple, Instagram as well as the other social media companies or entities.
    100.   Defendants, each and every one of them acting in concert, have deprived Freedom Watch and those similarly situated of its constitutional rights by censoring its content for purely political reasons. Defendants’ censorship is arbitrary and capricious, and is purely viewpoint based.
    101.   There exists no compelling, significant, or legitimate reason for the censoring of
    Freedom Watch’s content as well as the other members of the class.
    VI.   PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Plaintiff on behalf of itself and the other members of the class pray for
    relief and judgment against Defendant as follows:
    (a)   For general (non-economic), special (economic), actual and compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $1,000,000,000.00;
    (b)  For injunctive relief preventing Defendants, each and every one of them, acting in concert and individually as joint tortfeasors from discriminating against, refusing to deal, suppressing media content and advocacy, censoring Freedom Watch and those similarly situated members of the class.
    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
    Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury on all counts as to all issues so triable.

    Dated: August 29, 2018 Respectfully submitted,
    /s/ Larry Klayman
    Larry Klayman, Esq.

    Chairman and General Counsel FREEDOM WATCH, INC.
    D.C. Bar No. 334581
    2020 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 345 Washington, DC 20006
    Tel: (310) 595-0800
    Email: leklayman@gmail.com

    Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class

  • Tonio Gant
    Reply

    (Raelian Movement) – Soros Leaks Refer To UN Chief As ‘Elite, Behind The Scenes’ Soros Advocate
    Peter Sutherland (America) migrant crisis

    20 Aug 2016
    By Chris Tomlinson

    George Soros’ Open Society Foundation admits influence and incredibly close links with UN migration representative and former Goldman Sachs executive Peter Sutherland in leaked document.
    The paper, which told of how the migrant crisis presented an “opportunity” for the foundation to extend its global influence and attract more money, mentions Sutherland’s pro-migrant work. The foundation notes that through Sutherland they have been able to advocate at an “elite level” behind the scenes.
    Open Society are one of the contributors to the Columbia Global Policy Initiative (CGPI) which hosts Mr. Sutherland and claim that through Sutherland they are able to influence international migration policy due to the current migrant crisis. On the United Nations website Sutherland is described as a “strong advocate for promoting practical action to increase the benefits of migration” and has routinely made comments against national borders and national sovereignty in Europe. Sutherland has even called for the European Union to “undermine the homogeneity” of member states.
    Sutherland has even gone as far as defending all migrants regardless of whether or not they are legitimate refugees saying, “We’re not just talking, either, about refugees. We’re talking about economic migrants, many of whom could be the future, and some at the present… are survival fighters. They’re not to be dismissed as an irrelevance.”
    Last Year Sutherland argued that Britain was “xenophobic” because of border controls that stop the flow of migrants from Calais reaching Britain and earlier this year claimed that Brexit was an “act of insanity” and saying, “every independent voice in the world is saying it would be an act of insanity to leave the EU.”
    The Open Society International Migration Initiative (IMI) program claims that Sutherland and his team are very closely linked saying, ” IMI’s access to the Sutherland team’s discussions has allowed us to keep civil society partners up-to-date on the latest developments, in order to inform advocacy and campaigning strategies prior to the events and to plan follow up actions.”
    IMI also funded the “Sutherland Report” which they claim will, “set the stage for institutional reforms to global migration governance, and to break new ground on protections for migrants outside the asylum system,” or protection for migrants regardless if they qualify for asylum in Europe.
    “CGPI’s elite-level behind the scenes advocacy through Peter Sutherland, has positioned its team of experts to influence policy and practical follow-up to global events,” the author writes. They note that their funding of the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) allows the foundation to have influence over actively pro-migrant organizations like Sutherland’s team and MPI who they say are a “neutral voice” though MPI received over half of the 2015 budget of the IMI, some 2.2 million dollars.

    CNN Reporter Forgot She Was Live On TV And Exposed Obama – CNN is taking bribes from foreign countries.

     May 15, 2017 

    Admin CNN

    CNN is maybe the biggest liberal media outlet. They have been doing nothing but making Hillary Clinton look like an innocent victim. And now even one of their own journalist has found that CNN is also taking bribes from foreign countries.
    The CNN reporter who blew the lid on this issue was none other than Amber Lyon, formerly employed by CNN and an “award-winning reporter.” Yesterday, Lyon “blew the cover” on the network’s suspicious business practices.
    Lyon claims that CNN “is paid by the U.S. government for reporting on some events, and not reporting on others.” Lyon also told us that the network is a tool for the Obama Administration to manipulate the information the American Public gets to see.
    Lyon claims that Obama has been controlling what we know through CNN, her former employer.
    During Lyon’s interview with Joe Rogan, she explained that she and another female colleague were part of a 4 person team sent by CNN to Bahrain in 2011. Arriving in Bahrain, Lyon noticed something very odd- the United States government had been supplying over $1 billion worth in weaponry- including tear gas- to the oppressive Bahraini regime looking to suppress popular protests in the country.
    Lyon was threatened by United States government personnel while staying on a U.S. Navy base in Bahrain. She was told not to report the incident, or face grave consequences.
    But instead of this, CNN officials told her to shut her mouth and not report anything of the Bahraini government’s oppressive acts.

  • Tonio Gant
    Reply

    Vault 7: Projects
    Releases Documents
    All ReleasesDark Matter – 23 March, 2017
    Today, March 23rd 2017, WikiLeaks releases Vault 7 “Dark Matter”, which contains documentation for several CIA projects that infect Apple Mac firmware (meaning the infection persists even if the operating system is re-installed) developed by the CIA’s Embedded Development Branch (EDB). These documents explain the techniques used by CIA to gain ‘persistence’ on Apple Mac devices, including Macs and iPhones and demonstrate their use of EFI/UEFI and firmware malware.

    Among others, these documents reveal the “Sonic Screwdriver” project which, as explained by the CIA, is a “mechanism for executing code on peripheral devices while a Mac laptop or desktop is booting” allowing an attacker to boot its attack software for example from a USB stick “even when a firmware password is enabled”. The CIA’s “Sonic Screwdriver” infector is stored on the modified firmware of an Apple Thunderbolt-to-Ethernet adapter.

    “DarkSeaSkies” is “an implant that persists in the EFI firmware of an Apple MacBook Air computer” and consists of “DarkMatter”, “SeaPea” and “NightSkies”, respectively EFI, kernel-space and user-space implants.

    Documents on the “Triton” MacOSX malware, its infector “Dark Mallet” and its EFI-persistent version “DerStarke” are also included in this release. While the DerStarke1.4 manual released today dates to 2013, other Vault 7 documents show that as of 2016 the CIA continues to rely on and update these systems and is working on the production ofDerStarke2.0.

    Also included in this release is the manual for the CIA’s “NightSkies 1.2” a “beacon/loader/implant tool” for the Apple iPhone. Noteworthy is that NightSkies had reached 1.2 by 2008, and is expressly designed to be physically installed onto factory fresh iPhones. i.e the CIA has been infecting the iPhone supply chain of its targets since at least 2008.

    While CIA assets are sometimes used to physically infect systems in the custody of a target it is likely that many CIA physical access attacks have infected the targeted organization’s supply chain including by interdicting mail orders and other shipments (opening, infecting, and resending) leaving the United States or otherwise.
    Chinese Military Scientists Have Infiltrated “Five Eyes” Western Universities

    by Tyler Durden
    Mon, 10/29/2018 – 18:45

    Approximately 2,500 researchers from Chinese military universities have infiltrated Western universities over the past decade, focusing on the so-called “Five Eyes” group of countries, reports the Financial Times, citing a new report from Australian government-funded think tank, the Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI).
    According to the report, many of the Chinese researchers failed to disclose their military affiliations, while publishing a large volume of joint papers with Western scientists which can help Beijing’s technological ambitions.
    Over the past five years, researchers affiliated to the People’s Liberation Army published more joint papers with scientists from the UK and the US than with those of any other country.
    The findings will fuel the debate raging in some western capitals over how to control the flow of cutting-edge and especially dual-use technology to Beijing — one of the main fronts in their struggle to adapt to a rapidly rising China.
    The PLA’s international research collaboration “focuses on hard sciences, especially emerging and dual-use technologies”, said Alex Joske, author of the report that is being published by ASPI today. Dual-use technology has civilian and military applications. -Financial Times
    Joske found that the most dominant areas for collaboration between Chinese and foreign researchers were navigation technology, computer science and artificial intelligence (AI).
    In one example, several researchers visited UK universities and are continuing joint research on topics such as combustion in scramjet engines, which could power hypersonic aircraft capable of flying at six times the speed of sound. Wang Zhenguo, deputy chief of the PLA’s scramjet programme and head of the department of postgraduate studies at the NUDT, has co-authored 18 papers with foreign scientists. -Financial Times
    Another Scramjet researcher and aircraft design expert for the PLA’s General Armaments Department, Huang Wei, worked on his PhD while at the University of Leeds between 2008 and 2010, according to a researcher at the UK university. Another Chinese scramjet expert, Luo Wenlei, wrote his PhD thesis on scramjet engines while at Leeds in 2014. Both Luo and Huang along with Luo’s doctoral thesis supervisors have published together with Gen Wang on the scramjet technology.
    Qin Ning, a professor at the University of Sheffield involved in some of the exchanges with Chinese scramjet experts, said their joint research was fundamentally academic in nature. “I have not [been] involved in military related research myself or with the visitors while they [were] at Sheffield. Similarly the visitors [were not] involved in military related research while in Sheffield,” Prof Qin said.

  • INERT
    Reply

    Hispanic women are fat pieces of shit. One in two? Jesus fuck. And the rest of you fat fucks — stop shovelling sugar into your fat faces. Radiation from 5G is the least of your concerns.

  • SuperNatural 717
    Reply

    Cell Ular. affects the cells negatively just like the poor American diet also affects the cells. American’s are being taken out on many different levels but don’t realize this. We have the biggest sick-care industry in the world along with the biggest profit for prison system in the world. Time to ask the question; what’s going on America?

  • Rose Night
    Reply

    Of course they only give her 5 minutes to talk about something so important. We need more medical professionals to speak up about this because 5g is already being rolled out in some areas and eventually it will be everywhere if we can’t stop it. Make sure you switch your phone from 4g to 3g to mitigate some of the damage for now. Look it up if you’re not sure how.

  • Delta3 Actual
    Reply

    5G will cause diabetes. Are you kidding? They are scapegoating information technology when it is the food industry’s fault? Yes.

  • xXRambodianXx
    Reply

    Hmm 🤔
    I wonder if the masses will care.

    Super fast internet
    Vs
    Constantly spies on
    Cancer
    Mental health issues
    Diabetes
    Etc etc etc

    My money is on the fast internet, people are inherently stupid.

  • Alejandro Portillo
    Reply

    If coronal mass ejection from the sun hits earth it will take care of this issue. Same how an EMP works. Shuts down the grid, shuts down AI. Currently it’s in ancient prophecy and David wilcock speaks of this event we’re expecting. So Wel see!

  • Mark
    Reply

    Why aren’t there more physicians and professors calling this out?! She’s absolutely right and as someone who’s not a physician or a professor, I know the harmful effects of EMF’s on human biology. It’s absolute insanity that this is even being rolled out. God bless this doctor, we need a gathering of people in medical professionals, scientists and academics to come out against this and ban together in a clear united way to stop this. 

    The average person is so asleep and dumbed down that they just want a faster phone and don’t want to believe cell phones can cause any harm at all. Every cell phone has a SAR rating which you can look up and even then is almost a flawed system because any exposure is harmful. This is only one impact, we live in a soup of EMF pollution at home, at work and just about anywhere.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>