The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception – Trailer

Now available on DVD from pressfortruth.ca:
http://www.pressfortruth.ca/pft-shop/dvd-the-toronto-hearings-on-911-uncovering-ten-years-of-deception/

Ten years have passed since the World Trade Center attacks of September 11, 2001, and there are still many unanswered questions surrounding that fateful day.

In 2011, experts and scientists from around the world gathered in Toronto, Canada to present new and established evidence that questions the official story of 9/11. This evidence was presented to a distinguished panel of experts over a 4 day period.

Through their analysis and scientific investigations, they hope to spark a new investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Press For Truth and The International Center for 9/11 Studies Present:

“The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception”

Produced by:
Steven Davies
Dan Dicks
Bryan Law

An over 5 hour DVD, with comprehensive coverage of the 4 day Toronto Hearings from September 2011.

Featuring expert witness testimony from:

David Ray Griffin
Richard Gage
David Chandler
Kevin Ryan
Niels Harrit
Barbara Honegger
Peter Dale Scott
Graeme MacQueen
Jonathan Cole
Cynthia McKinney
…and many more!

Pre order the DVD today from pressfortruth.ca:
http://www.pressfortruth.ca/pft-shop/dvd-the-toronto-hearings-on-911-uncovering-ten-years-of-deception/

Download the DVD from pressfortruth.tv:
http://pressfortruth.tv/register/

As a Press For Truth TV subscriber you’ll have full access to the site’s features and content including Daily Video Blogs on current news from the PFT perspective and High Quality Downloads of all Press For Truth Films, Music and Special Reports! Subscribe to Press For Truth TV: http://pressfortruth.tv/register/

For more information visit:
http://pressfortruth.tv/

http://www.facebook.com/PressForTruth
http://www.youtube.com/weavingspider
http://twitter.com/#!/DanDicksPFT

http://pressfortruth.ca/

(41345)

About The Author
-

30 Comments

  • sausageman
    Reply

    Is the 9/11 commission report an engineering report? The answer is NO! So why in the fuck would they talk about it. You’re not too bright are you?

  • sausageman
    Reply

    Of course I went to the Hearings. Look at my videos, moron!
    I sure didn’t pay 200 bucks to go inside though. I’m not a butt-fucking retarded truther!

  • sausageman
    Reply

    Aww.. boo fucking hoo… disdain4braincells is having a hissy fit ’cause he can’t come and shit on my channel any more!

  • sausageman
    Reply

    hMMMM…you can’t form a proper sentence and can’t even spell ‘retard’.
    I think we need a new fucktard classification system just for you!

  • sausageman
    Reply

    I noticed. I’m proud of your motivation to improve your 3rd grade writing/ thinking skills… it’s admirable!!

  • Bill Moir
    Reply

    ah, thinking skills eh sausage? you left your comment there for anyone to see. the 911 commission didn’t mention wtc 7 coming down because it’s not an engineering report. game over. you’re a fucking retaaaard, lying, shilling , sausage licking fuckwit

  • MrNoblemanoflove
    Reply

    You’re amazing….(click)….You’re amazing….(click)….You’re amazing….(click)….You’re amazing….(click)….You’re amazing….(click)….You’re amazing….(click)….You’re amazing….(click)….BUMP!….amazingly dense!

  • joe banana
    Reply

    How sickening is this? Canada has to do what the war criminals in the US government refuse to do. Now, someone has to kidnap Bush and Cheney and water board them for the information they have on the operation on 911. They HAVE to answer for their actions.

  • onegathers
    Reply

    quick, while the corpse of trutherism is still warm, send as much money as you can raise to messrs harrit and gage, and keep them in the comfort they have got used to. it’s your money, and a fool is soon parted from his.

  • Wim Ahlers
    Reply

    The dogma of the truth movement is well known. Its claims fits rigtht into the moon landing hoax claim, the Elvis is still alive claim, the global warming is not happening claim, the Roswell space aliens and alien abduction claims, the alien crop circle claims, the smake is not responsible for (lung) cancer claim, etc.
    But don’t let me stop you to unquestionably and slavishly accept your denier heros at face value.
    In the mean time all(!) truther movements dance around the truth of building 5.

  • WillFreemen
    Reply

    It is clear that you either work for the CIA or believe their propaganda. If the buildings “pancaked” as NIST claims, at least some of the steel columns would remain standing. None remained standing. The FBI & NIST didn’t follow standard forensic procedures for the investigation. All steel salvaged, major evidence for a forensic investigation, was illegally shipped off to China. The explosions are clear for all to see in this video. Did you watch it? Either you smell the rat or you are a rat….

  • Wim Ahlers
    Reply

    I suggest you not only look to this and similar videos. I suggest you verify them!
    Doing so you will discover that absolutely nothing will be left of the accusing claims uttered in these and similar videos.
    As to building 7 … it collapsed for the exact same reason as a substantial internal part of building 5 collapsed. But this fact is never presented at conspiracy sites. Or when it is, waved away with the utterly irrelevant remark that contrary building 7, building 5 did not totally collapse.

  • flyingfishsurf
    Reply

    It’s been twelve years now, time to at least start thinking like an adult or at least a precocious pre-teen. Get your head out of the sand in your ass. Apparently, the laws of physics were put on hold that day. Can you say ‘eutectic reaction’ or ‘sulfidation’? This was NEVER explained. Start there. Until ALL anomalies are explained, no theory is complete. I know it’s an abrupt reality change, but you’re 12 now. You can take it.

  • Wim Ahlers
    Reply

    Ignoring the ad hominem … have you found any accredited scientific institution anywhere in the world with subject matter knowledge that agrees with any of your claims?
    If not … untill at least one of your claims is supported, your theory fails. I know it is an abrupt change, but I think you can take it.

  • Great White7
    Reply

    The Dept of defence was originally going to be called the Dept of War, but Edward Bernays (you should know who he is, and what he did), convinced them to change it.

  • Ron Bohlouli
    Reply

    911 remains a gaping wound. Debunkers on this and all other threads are deliberately pouring salt on this wound.

  • Denise Gamey
    Reply

    What company paid out the insurance and how are the individuals that were paid out not in jail and money divided to the families of the survivors with a full apology for the American government’s collision with these individuals. It’s never too late to come clean as an individual, a brueacracy, or a government.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>