Confronting Communists And Exposing Their Crooked Ideology

In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth confronts a group of Communists about their anti-capitalist views.

Support Press For Truth by becoming a PFT Patron at

Follow Dan Dicks:
on Facebook ➜
on Instagram ➜
on Twitter ➜!/DanDicksPFT
on Snapchat ➜

Youtube ➜
Press For Truth TV ➜

Support Press For Truth:
Donate ➜

Rock some PFT Gear ➜

Want to donate bitcoin? Everything helps!

Press For Truth
#202- 1252 Burrard St.
Vancouver BC, V6Z 1Z1



About The Author


  • Mike Hunt

    Capitalism is good , large government is bad. Study Milton Friedman and
    Thomas Sowell and cut back on the Tryptamines.

  • BiddieTube

    Thanks for getting us some info about this group. I had gone to their
    website yesterday, spent about 20 minutes clicking through all their pages
    and links and could not come up with a clue as to what they are. They have
    no mission, no plan, no accomplishments, no goals, no plans etc posted on
    their site. In this video, we have a couple of the members stating some
    things they believe, but we need to know, as a whole, what does the
    organization represent, what are their goals, plans, accomplishments, etc.
    Maybe you would try to find that out for us? We all need to know that, ..
    if they have ever posted or answered those most important questions in the
    first place. Based on the tiny and few hints of what they are about I have
    come across, I do not think they actually have the people’s interest in
    mind. Almost nothing to base that on though.

  • plushmeth

    I took you for an An-cap Dan. I lean left, but Im skeptical an ancom
    society would work, or be better than todays society.

  • victor pross

    Anarchist communism is a form of anarchism that advocates the abolition of
    the State and capitalism in favour of a horizontal network.
    Anarchist communism stresses egalitarianism and the abolition of social
    hierarchy and class distinctions that arise from unequal wealth
    distribution, the abolition of capitalism and money, and the collective
    production and distribution of wealth.
    In anarchist communism, the state and property no longer exist. Each
    individual and group is free to contribute to production and to satisfy
    their needs based on their own choice. Systems of production and
    distribution are managed by their participants.
    Anarchist communist currents appeared during the English Civil War and the
    French Revolution of the 17th and 18th centuries, respectively.
    Gerrard Winstanley wrote in his 1649 pamphlet, The New Law of
    Righteousness, that there “shall be no buying or selling, no fairs nor
    markets, but the whole earth shall be a common treasury for every man,” and
    “there shall be no Lord over others, but every one shall be a Lord of
    And perhaps a more famous name would be Peter Kropotkin , an
    anarcho-communist thinker of the 19th century who maintained that, in
    …houses, fields, and factories will no longer be private property, and
    that they will belong to the commune or the nation and money, wages, and
    trade would be abolished.
    Now, the significance here is that thinkers such as Murray Rotherbard who
    wrote in the 1950 to the 1980s advocated anarchism and free-markets –
    Modern follows of the anarcho-communism ideas charged Rothbard for
    pre-empting the anarchist movement by spinning it on it’s head and making
    it something it’s not.
    Anarcho-capitalism, of course, is a political philosophy that advocates the
    elimination of the state in favor of individual sovereignty, private
    property, and free markets.
    In an anarcho-capitalist society, law enforcement, courts, and all other
    security services would be operated by privately funded competitors rather
    than centrally through compulsory taxation.
    Anarcho-communists advocate the elimination of the state, but they differ
    from the anarcho-capitalism on the issue of private property and
    In an anarcho-capitalist society, law enforcement, courts, and all other
    security services would be operated by privately funded competitors rather
    than centrally through compulsory taxation.
    So it becomes a matter of WILL THE REAL ANARCHISTS PLEASE STAND UP.
    The anarcho-communists will claim that they are the real anarchists by
    virtue of the fact that they wrote decades and decades before Rothbard came
    on the scene with his private property version of “anarchism.”
    Anarchy has always been an important theme in political philosophy.
    And we can go back hundreds and hundreds ago, back to the days of ancient
    Greece – way before the 19th century anarcho-communists – where we have the
    Greek philosopher Plato:
    Plato, like many enemies of individualism after him, defended his
    authoritarian measures as a preventative remedy for anarchy:
    “Anarchy – the absence of the commander – is what we should expel root and
    branch from the lives of mankind.”
    Plato mentions a “commander” by which he meant the PHILSOPHER KING.
    This has nothing to do with businessmen and property rights.
    We can jump ahead in history to the 16th century where we have philosophers
    like John Locke, where we have within the Lockean paradigm justification of
    the rights resistance and revolution (in the cases where governments
    overstep their boundaries and become too tyrannical to tolerate) caused his
    critics to condemn Locke’s writings as a recipe for anarchy.
    Philosophers such as Edmund Burke and Jeremy Bentham both condemned the
    anarchistic implications of the Lockean philosophy.
    There is Sir Robert Filmer, who wrote in the 16th century, was a diehard
    statist, better known as an absolutist – he argued for patriarchalism – a
    popular method of defending the divine right of Kings.
    Anyway, Filmer challenged consent theorists to show how any sovereign
    government can be justified if we begin with the supposition that people
    are naturally free and equal.
    CONSENT THEORY: (All the people in the world in the world, according to the
    premises of consent theory, are born equally free from political
    subjection, so it follows that “a joint consent of the whole people of the
    world” would be required to establish a government – and of course John
    Locke was an instrumental influence of the American revolution.
    Filmer repeatedly asserted that the doctrine of natural liberty – which was
    commonly called upon to limit the powers of government – actually destroys
    the foundations of government and lands us in anarchy instead.
    From all this, we can see that ‘anarchism’ pertains to issue of the state,
    not a businessman and market economies.

  • Edward Feenman

    seize the means of production, translation, without capitalist to build a
    system to steal we could never get communism started.

  • Suu to (Ceut)

    man that kid with a flower in his ear smoking a ciggar, the fuck listened
    to this guy and said yea this guys the smart one

  • Melon Farmer Media

    They’re gonna kill capitalists in the revolution? Motherfucker, I’ll
    Pinochet style throw your fucking ass out of a helicopter right after you
    watch your whole fucking communist whore family plow into the goddamn soil!

  • eder feder

    If I wanted to go into the outside world to have a conversation with an
    idiot , I would have gone to stand in line @ Rogers or Telus or Bell or the
    bank ! Don’t need to see it on my feeds PFT !

  • dan katla sharpe

    communism has failed, capitalism has failed, where is the middle ground
    between the two ?
    competition in business has failed, big government has failed, consumerism
    has failed,
    what comes next is rebellion……………….good luck america !!! wonder
    why they want your guns ??? it certainly not because it’s immoral or they
    care about people being killed, it’s about control when the shit hits the
    fan, america has to fail all empires do.

  • Jeremy Koffarnus

    You mindless fucks act like the makers of this video didn’t just talk over
    these anarchists and interrupt them constantly.

  • elicia clegg

    I think that Communist’s hearts are in the right place, but they don’t get
    that centralization of power always leads to a worse situation.

  • Justin Schwalm

    I understand their criticism of capitalism but in their way people who want
    to work for wages and try to earn more wouldn’t be permitted and in our way
    if they chose to live in a community that didn’t want to work for wages and
    operated the way they wanted we just wouldn’t go there and would leave them
    alone. Anarcho-capitalsm is the only way in which people are free to choose
    how they want to live and would permit all systems that we know today. If a
    collective of property owners wanted to pay for a security service to
    patrol their area with certain rules and they all decided to give up their
    right to bare arms and relied on the security to keep them safe, they
    could. I wouldn’t, but as long as those involved are willing and it doesn’t
    effect me or anyone else then who cares?

  • Awakened2Truth - Disciple of Jesus the Christ

    The synagogue of satan… the rulers of the planet in all realms of
    industry, are the ones who own the courts and run the courts, they are the
    highest level of the Pharisee Banking High Priests.. and you’re not allowed
    free speech.. they were the Bolsheviks in U.S.S.R. Russia.. they have many
    masks, everytime you discover who they are, they change the mask, 1000
    masks is the metaphor. Wake up people, please, wake up.. the
    communist/socialist ideology is a “JUDAISM” ideology and “JUDAISM” isn’t
    Old Testament Faith contrary to global mind control;

    *”The Jews _(wanna be physical israeiltes)** are responsible for Bolshevism
    in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my
    reign, and i bitterly regret the favours i showed to prominent Jew’ish
    Bankers”*_ — Kaiser Wilhelm II, The Last Great Emperor of Germany,
    expressing his views on the Jew’ish Bolsheviks – Chicago Tribune July 2nd,

    *”We have already seen substantial evidence that any notion of Pharisaism
    (or later rabbinic Judaism) as the true and direct descendants of the Old
    Testament is contradicted by the most fundamental assumptions of one
    Mishnah-tractate after another. These stand wholly separate from the
    Priestly Code… and generally contradict it!”* –Jacob Neusner *A History
    of the Mishnaic Law of Purities* (Brill Academic, 1974), p. 7. – ISBN-10:

    The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that Judaism is based on the
    teachings of the Pharisees and not upon the Law of Moses: *“The Jewish
    religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all
    the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found
    expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal
    is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single
    member of that literature.”* – Vol. VIII, p. 474 (1942).

    *“Some call it Marxism (Communism), I call it Judaism”* – Rabbi Stephen

    *“Zionism is Judaism, and Judaism is unthinkable without Zionism.”*
    (Harper’s Encyclopedia of United States History, Vol. X, “Zionists”).

    *“The Jew is an inborn communist.”* Otto Weininger, a Jew, Sex & Character,
    Page 311”.

    *“Bolshevism and Communism, were Jewish created, Jewish proposed, Jewish
    Financed, Jewish led and Jewish operated. The most murderous regime this
    planet has ever known, was Jewish through & through.”* – Maurice Penay

    The “Jews” admit that they are not the descendants of the Ancient
    Israelites in their writings. Under the heading of “A brief History of the
    Terms for Jew” in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following;

    *’Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or
    to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”*

  • clixbits

    hmmm… not one of your better efforts. i’m afraid i could only make it
    through 1 minute and 14 seconds.


    you guys are so annoying you can’t even have a simple debate you guys just
    keep talking over them like children

  • TekkGnostic

    Your average ancom is exactly what you’d stereo-typically imagine them to
    be. Cocky college kids posturing themselves as “rebels,” whose social
    “science” teacher taught them everything there is to understand about how
    the world works, and it’s their job to carry-out the jihad. .

  • Jeremy Stolz

    I hate the idea that the left has that if someone’s rich they got that way
    by screwing everyone over, I’ve seen what happens when business owners
    conduct themselves that way and they usually end up filing for bankruptcy.

    A friend of my father-in-law’s was born into money and when he was about 22
    his dad gave him the money to start a fencing company, after about 5 years
    of screwing just about everyone over the business filed bankruptcy & was
    closed down, same story with several other businesses. The man now lives in
    a home his parents owned and works at a Barnes & Nobles. One of his former
    employees now operates the largest fencing companies in the area, the right

  • Ruben Campbell

    Corporations are a problem for Capitalism, they get more representation
    than small businesses and actual people… which is not a real reward for
    success: destroying the competition is NOT capitalism, it’s actually
    socialism for corporations.
    The ideal way to proceed is to actually regulate power at higher levels of
    businesses, this would be needed because big businesses don’t have morals
    or ethics, they only want to get more money.
    And ironically this would benefit competitiveness, making capitalism
    stronger: as in better opportunities, and thus more business partners for
    higher levels of business.

  • солдат специального назначения

    obviosly anarcho capitalism is superior. these cucks are economically
    illiterate. child prostitution is within the bounds of the NAP.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>