Why Anarcho-Communists Are NOT Real Anarchists (AnCap vs. AnCom)

Josh Sigurdson breaks down from an AnCap position why AnComs are NOT real anarchists.

Seizing the means of production is sabotage and violates the non-aggression principle. When people voluntarily sign up for a job they are not being enslaved. Forcing others collectively to pay for their refusal to work is slavery. Using collective force against others is not anarchy, voluntary interactions without coercion are.
The private contract is voluntary. The social contract is not. These are incredibly simple notions that far too many leftist AnComs refuse to understand. You need the state or ruling collectives to enforce rules on others to not voluntarily work for others. Private property is not debatable. Those that look to take that away from us are not anarchists, they’re collectivists who wish to use force.
These AnCom groups funded by George Soros to push chaos on the populace are the reason why people stray away from anarchy. They perpetuate the long held stereotype of the bomb-throwing anarchist but Anarcho-Capitalists and voluntaryists leave open the right to create your own commune as long as these AnComs leave us alone and don’t use force against us.
The hypocrisy among AnComs piles high, so we put this together for those that just don’t quite understand.
Extortion, theft and any other type of involuntary force will not be tolerated.

Make sure to share this with your friends!

Video edited by Josh Sigurdson

Josh Sigurdson

Graphics by Bryan Foerster and Josh Sigurdson

Visit us at www.WorldAlternativeMedia.com

LIKE us on Facebook here:

Follow us on Twitter here:

Help keep us capitalist pigs in the independent media alive!

Pledge here and you may be rewarded!

World Alternative Media

“Find the truth, be the change!”


About The Author


  • Raphael Verelst

    I already posted on your FB post in Ronny Freedom’s ancap page, but I’ll
    just repeat myself.

    I’ll agree with you that most ancoms are useless thieves that demand to be
    coddled, but some of them have good points, namely that capitalism, if left
    in control of a few large landowners, will be inherently hierarchical. This
    is true, however it can be properly counter-acted for if people only defend
    themselves. Large landowners need cadres of soldiers to defend themselves,
    but if everybody has a small piece of land and defends it with a rifle,
    he’ll be able to repel people.

    The NAP is hard to enforce and anyone who thinks it will magically work
    because of market has not seen history. Unless people can come together and
    actively work to prop up each other, they will get run over.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>